Article

 

The I-66 Challenge: Diverging Strategies Straddling the Beltway

carpool - many cars on the highway

CULTIVATING A CARPOOL CULTURE

The Northern Virginia region recently overtook Los Angeles as having the most congested traffic in the country, according to Gary Garczynski, speaker at the NVAR Sept. 3 Public Policy Forum, Fixing I-66. Aiming to explain how the plans for addressing the highways’ issues will help to improve traffic conditions, Garczynski cited a report by the Texas A&M Transportation Institute and INRIX Inc. that commuters in the D.C. metro region spend an extra 82 hours each year stuck in traffic.

“The biggest challenge is I-66,” says Garczynski, president of National Capital Land and Development Company and Northern Virginia district representative on the Commonwealth Transportation Board. He is also the Northern Virginia Transportation Authority. Garczynski told the audience that the solution is a “tale of two diverging strategies,” inside and outside the beltway. Tackling the traffic mess will take years of planning, funding and construction, he noted. 

OUTSIDE THE BELTWAY PROPOSED PLAN
The solution “can’t be just more pavement,” Garczynski said of the proposal to add lanes. The “Transform 66” website states its outside the beltway objective as “improving multimodal mobility along the I-66 corridor by providing diverse travel choices in a cost-effective manner.” 

Garczynski explained that a significant objective to achieve the outside-the-beltway- goals is to accommodate more than automobiles while limiting the amount of land taken by using eminent domain. 

The project, named has already reduced the number of eminent domain takings that were originally proposed. This process is one of the most contested issues within the Transform 66 project, Garczynski said.  In order for the widening project to occur, privately owned land needs to be purchased and redeveloped for converting it into the expanded highway. The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) is working to limit takings, but has been clear that such land acquisition is necessary to accomplish the goals of adding multiple transportation methods or additional lanes. 

Integrating public transit outside the beltway could greatly improve congestion on eastbound I-66.
Current proposals include:
- two express lanes alongside three regular lanes in each direction
- space in the median for future transit
- dedicated express lanes access points
- safety and operational improvements at key interchanges throughout the corridor
- new transit services such as new and expanded park and ride lots and bus service
- corridor-wide bikeway, trail, and sidewalk improvements.

Garczynski stated that I-66 is likely going to have “an accommodation for some type of rail or bus rapid transit in the middle, and a separation between the free lanes [and the toll lanes] will be just like you see on the [I-495] beltway now.” Additional High Occupancy Traffic (HOT) lanes are also included in most proposals, he noted.

PROPOSED FUNDING
Outside-the-beltway projects are expected to be funded via public tax dollars and public-private partnership contributions. One form of proposed income, the dynamic tolling system, has faced scrutiny in past projects and met similar concern at the September forum. 

“If we pay for it with your taxes, in all likelihood we will not just need some cooperation from the state, but also some dollars contributed from the Northern Virginia Transit Authority,” he said.

INSIDE THE BELTWAY
Space restraints to expand roadways and the goal of getting people into Washington drive the need for alternative I-66 options inside the beltway, Garczynski noted. One of the first solutions he mentioned was the conversion of I-66 to HOT lanes with a non-tolled HOV-3+ option (currently HOV-2).

A second major change would be to widen I-66 between the Dulles exit and Ballston. “Forty-four percent of people who use I-66 inside the beltway don’t use the Roosevelt Bridge,” Garczynski said.
Other proposed solutions include
- bike and pedestrian Access
- tolling non-HOV3+ during peak hours
- improved transit service (metro, bus).

Garczynski believes adding these options will facilitate building a “carpool culture” on I-66. For more information about this project please visitwww.transform66.org
Featured Resources